Trust center

Eight application selection examples and four layers of project verification.

These in-house examples explain component selection and proposed acceptance checks. Verify company details and agree the evidence required for your actual project before ordering.

illustrative selection examples

8

Each in-house example links a problem to component choices and proposed acceptance checks; it is not a customer project.

verification layers

4

Factory identity, sample proof, measurable acceptance and delivery documentation are separated.

product families

11

Cameras, lenses, lights, readers, 3D vision, measuring systems and flexible feeding routes are cross-linked.

selection brief target

24h

Complete RFQs can be converted into a first engineering route before formal quotation.

Acceptance matrix

Agree measurable gates before a machine vision route becomes an order.

A high-trust quote should say what was checked, what remains open and which evidence supports the recommendation. These gates help buyers separate engineering proof from a catalog-only quote.

Send samples for review
Optical route confidence

Camera, lens and lighting route explained against sample surface, FOV, working distance and contrast risk.

Sample-image notes, route comparison photo, open constraints and rejected alternatives.

Repeatability target

Good, bad and edge-case sample checks repeated before the model route is locked.

Acceptance matrix with target feature, tolerance, sample count and expected pass/fail decision.

False-pass and no-read risk

Known failure modes documented for defect inspection, barcode reading, 3D height or presence checks.

Worst-case sample photos, risk boundary notes and the condition that still needs onsite validation.

Cycle-time and integration readiness

Line speed, trigger method, output signal and mounting envelope checked before delivery handoff.

I/O notes, controller route, cable/accessory list and integration handoff summary.

RFQ proof pack

Documents buyers can ask for before internal approval.

  • RFQ intake summary with part, defect, FOV, working distance, line speed and interface requirements.
  • Sample-image review notes showing good parts, bad parts and edge-case constraints.
  • Hardware route table covering camera, lens, lighting, reader, 3D or flexible feeder candidates.
  • Acceptance matrix for repeatability, read rate, false-pass risk, timing and sample variation.
  • Packing, accessory and shipment checklist when the quote moves from route selection to delivery.
Engineering ownership

Responsibilities to clarify in an engineering response.

These are suggested responsibilities to agree for a project, not named or verified staff credentials.

  • Application route reviewer: Translates the buyer problem into inspection target, sample evidence, optical constraints and route options.
  • Optics and lighting reviewer: Checks whether contrast, working distance, lens choice and lighting geometry can support repeatable decisions.
  • Delivery evidence owner: Keeps RFQ notes, acceptance criteria, packing checks and handoff records aligned with the approved route.

Download examples

Example templates for defining the project-specific records you need.

These in-house templates are example structures, not redacted customer records or completed test reports. Agree which real records are required and available for your own project.

Request project proof

Verification layers

Separate engineering proof from marketing claims.

The public examples explain which records to request. For your actual project, agree sample notes, route assumptions, acceptance checks and delivery documentation before order confirmation.

Request evidence review
2 public addresses

Factory identity proof

The site publishes legal company name, phone, email, office address and factory address so buyers can verify the supplier entity before RFQ.

Legal company nameOffice addressFactory addressDirect email and phone
4 RFQ inputs minimum

Sample and route proof

Engineering review starts from sample photos, defect target, field of view and line constraints before recommending a camera, light, lens or reader route.

Good and bad samplesTarget defect or codeFOV and working distanceLine speed or cycle time
3+ measurable checks

Acceptance proof

Every delivery route should state the measurable checks that make the quote safe: repeatability, read rate, false-pass risk, timing or calibration stability.

Repeatability targetFalse-pass checkRead-rate targetTiming or throughput check
Example document structures

Delivery documentation proof

Example sample-review and acceptance document structures explain what evidence should be gathered for a real project. No customer delivery records are claimed.

Sample image setOptical test notePacking or shipment photoIntegration handoff note

Publication boundary

What the public selection examples establish.

Each route states an inspection problem, the component order it implies and the proposed acceptance checks to validate it. No buyer, plant, order or person is identified anywhere in the text.

Not applicable. These routes are illustrative — worked examples of how a selection decision is reached, written in house. No engagement, buyer or site sits behind any of them, so there is no party whose permission could be sought. This is not a record of consent obtained; it is a record that consent has no subject here.

Numeric checks, sample counts and planning windows are example targets to agree and validate, not achieved results or guaranteed lead times. Public application illustrations are teaching visuals, not evidence of a customer installation.

Public identity

Published company details buyers can verify.

  • Company: Foshan Deyi Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.
  • WhatsApp: direct chat with engineering
  • Email: sales [at] deyivision.com
  • Factory: 5/F, Building 13, Area A, Guangdong New Light Source Industrial Base, Luocun, Shishan Town, Nanhai District, Foshan, Guangdong, China
Project-specific verification

Records to agree for your own project.

  • Anonymous sample image set with good, bad and edge-case parts.
  • Optical route notes showing camera, lens and lighting decision logic.
  • Acceptance checklist for repeatability, read rate, false-pass risk or timing.
  • Packing, shipment or integration handoff notes when privacy scope allows it.

Application selection examples

Eight in-house worked examples with proposed validation requirements.

Open selection examples
Illustrative application visual: PCB connector pin presence inspection station with industrial camera and lighting
In-house worked example

PCB Connector Pin Presence Inspection

Best used when a buyer needs proof that small metal pins remain visible after fixture, height and reflection changes.

20+ good and bad connector samples before threshold lock0 false-pass target on missing-pin golden samples
Illustrative application visual: Automotive metal surface defect inspection station with camera and bar lighting
In-house worked example

Automotive Metal Surface Defect Inspection

Best used when the metal finish changes from batch to batch and the lighting route must be proven before quoting.

3 lighting geometries compared before model selectionWorst-case defect samples photographed at line speed
Illustrative application visual: Packaging label and barcode traceability inspection on conveyor line
In-house worked example

Packaging Label and Barcode Traceability

Best used when shipping errors, no-read events or wrong-label risk must be reduced without slowing the conveyor.

99.5%+ buyer-requested read-rate target before line acceptanceWorst-angle label samples included in test set
Illustrative application visual: Direct part mark code reading review for metal parts with camera and lighting
In-house worked example

Direct Part Mark Code Reading on Metal Parts

Best used when code contrast depends on mark depth, machining texture or reflective metal surface behavior.

Worst-case DPM marks included in read-rate test3 surface-finish variations reviewed before settings freeze
Illustrative application visual: Battery tab weld height inspection station with industrial vision hardware
In-house worked example

Battery Tab Weld Height Inspection

Best used when 2D contrast cannot prove weld geometry and a measurable height or profile route is required.

Height or profile repeatability target defined before quoteReflective weld samples tested for missing profile data
Illustrative application visual: Roll-to-roll web defect inspection line with line scan camera
In-house worked example

Roll-to-Roll Web Defect Inspection

Best used when the inspection must cover moving film, paper, textile or sheet material without motion distortion.

Full material width mapped before sensor selectionSmallest defect target converted into pixel requirement
Illustrative application visual: Stamped part instant measurement setup with camera and backlight stage
In-house worked example

Stamped Part Instant Measurement

Best used when manual gauges are too slow or inconsistent for small stamped, machined or molded parts.

Tolerance table confirmed before feature setupRepeatability checked across operator placement variation
Illustrative application visual: Robot guidance pick and place positioning cell with camera and ring lighting
In-house worked example

Robot Guidance Pick and Place Positioning

Best used when part position, height or overlap changes the robot pickup result and calibration must remain maintainable.

Pickup coordinate tolerance confirmed before route selectionPart-presentation variation tested across sample set

Evidence workflow

How to move from trust check to delivery-ready quote.

Use RFQ tools
01

Factory identity proof

The site publishes legal company name, phone, email, office address and factory address so buyers can verify the supplier entity before RFQ.

02

Sample and route proof

Engineering review starts from sample photos, defect target, field of view and line constraints before recommending a camera, light, lens or reader route.

03

Acceptance proof

Every delivery route should state the measurable checks that make the quote safe: repeatability, read rate, false-pass risk, timing or calibration stability.

04

Delivery documentation proof

Example sample-review and acceptance document structures explain what evidence should be gathered for a real project. No customer delivery records are claimed.

Trust FAQ

How to read public examples and request project-specific evidence.

Ask engineering
Are Deyi Vision case studies customer delivery records?

No. The eight routes are in-house application selection examples. No customer engagement, buyer or site sits behind them. They explain component choices and proposed acceptance checks, not completed deliveries or measured performance. Their illustrative nature is not an NDA or customer-privacy claim.

What evidence can buyers ask for before placing an order?

For their actual project, buyers should agree which sample-image notes, optical comparisons, model recommendation records, test results, packing checks and integration notes are required and available. The public examples do not establish that these records already exist for a customer delivery.

Why does Deyi Vision separate application briefs from trust evidence?

Application examples explain selection logic. The trust center distinguishes those teaching examples from company details to verify and the project-specific test results and delivery documents a buyer should request.

What should be included in a high-confidence RFQ?

Send at least part photos or drawings, target defect or code, field of view, working distance, line speed, tolerance and the required output method. Flexible feeder RFQs should also include part size, weight and pickup behavior.

Evidence-based RFQ

Send samples and ask for the evidence package before final model selection.

The strongest RFQ includes sample images, defect criteria, line speed, tolerance, working distance, interface needs and the delivery documents you need for internal approval.

Request engineering RFQ
Contact

Direct RFQ contact

Talk to engineering about the inspection problem.

Send sample images, competitor model, FOV, working distance and line speed before model selection.

Target: selection brief within 24h
Send sample images